What fish bones are less suitable for babies to eat

  Fish is rich in nutrients, and eating fish regularly is very beneficial to the body. Because fish has high nutritional value, many parents want to give their babies fish. But fish and meat foods have a disadvantage, which is that they may have thorns, and if not careful, they can easily get stuck in children. So, what fish bones are less suitable for babies to eat?

  

What fish bones are less suitable for babies to eat1

  1. Yellow croaker: This is a fish that is particularly suitable for babies to eat. Yellow croaker is very nutritious, with a lot of protein in its meat. There are also abundant trace elements such as calcium, phosphorus, iron, and iodine. And the meat and softness of yellow croaker can help children digest and absorb it better. In addition, yellow croaker has very few spines and its meat is garlic like, making it very suitable for babies to chew.

  2. Salmon: Salmon, also known as salmon, is a deep-sea fish. Salmon has very few spines, so babies won't get stuck when they eat it. The meat of salmon is tender and delicious, very tasty. Not only can it be eaten raw, but it can also be used to cook dishes, making it a very popular fish among people. If you want to give salmon to a baby, it should be cooked and eaten, and you cannot give the baby raw fish slices.

  3. Sea bass: Sea bass has few spines on its body and its meat is tender, making it the most suitable for steaming. Sea bass is not only rich in protein, but also contains many substances such as vitamin B2, phosphorus, and iron, which are very suitable for babies to consume.

Related Articles